Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "i shot, 2 shot, 3 shots more.."

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

jeran ([info]jeran) wrote,
@ 2008-03-27 09:34:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: productive

Rule for consultants
Never ever rely primarily on a single large contract. Several smaller ones are more reliable. Contracts will go south, and when they do the impact on you depends on how large a fraction of your business that contract is. See the Wal-Mart/record-labels post below for example. CD sales are 2% of Wal-Mart's business, Wal-Mart sales are 20% of the labels' business. If that deal goes south, the impact on Wal-Mart will be negligible. The impact on the labels, however, is going to be major. The same thing with consulting deals. If a contract that goes bad is 10% of your business, you only lose 10% of your income while you find a replacement (and a replacement will be easier to find, there's more small deals out there than large ones). If that contract's 75% of your business, you're out 75% of your income if it goes bad. Which would you rather deal with?



(Post a new comment)


Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs